Face antispoofing using comparison of LBP histograms
dev_eer | 0.366667 |
---|---|
dev_eer_threshold | -0.190719 |
dev_far | 0.366667 |
dev_frr | 0.366667 |
test_far | 0.34 |
test_frr | 0.45 |
test_hter | 0.395 |
dev_numNegatives | 300 |
dev_numPositives | 60 |
test_numNegatives | 400 |
test_numPositives | 80 |
dev_scoreDistribution | |
test_scoreDistribution | |
dev_roc | |
test_roc |
Histograms of LBP features are computed for the samples in the training-set. From these histograms, mean-histograms are computed for each of the two classes: real, and attack. Given a new probe, a histograms of LBP features is computed for the probe, and this is compared with the mean-histograms of the two classes. The probe is assigned to the class closest to it, based on the chi-square distance for histogram-similarity.
This method is described in the paper by Chingovska et al:
@INPROCEEDINGS{Chingovska_IEEEBIOSIG2012_2012, author = {Chingovska, Ivana and Anjos, Andr{\'{e}} and Marcel, S{\'{e}}bastien}, projects = {Idiap, TABULA RASA}, month = sep, title = {On the Effectiveness of Local Binary Patterns in Face Anti-spoofing}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of the Biometrics Special Interest Group}, year = {2012}, }
Updated | Name | Actions | |
---|---|---|---|
Jan. 5, 2017 | sbhatta/replay_antispoofing (PAD experiments using ReplayAttack database) |